I'm going to keep this short because Becky has threatened retribution if I spend too long dwelling on either Harry Potter or Buffy the Vampire Slayer (Sept. 24, season preview, UPN's teaser is pathetic).
Jim Schwab
over at BlogCritics digs into JK Rowling for the time it's taking her to write Book Five. He says:
Apparently, J.K. Rowling's successful movie-making career and the success of the first four Harry Potter books has just plain drained her. What a tragedy. How Sad....I don't care if you are [suffering from Writer's Block] and if you're not, does that imply that you are just too busy with the nice life to make it worthwhile for the fans that have given you that nice life?
First off, JKR doesn't "owe" her fans anything. No writer does; writers write -- or should write -- because they want to, not because they have to. Even journalists on deadlines complain about the deadline not because they don't want to write the article, but because they don't appriciate their editor breathing down their neck about drafts and revisions. It's probably this sense that is putting the damper on JKR's creativity. If she feels that she "has" to write an amazing book, then I guarantee that she'll get stuck on writing. Orson Scott Card, on his
website has said that the best way to find your muse is to write. He's correct, but it doesn't mean that what gets written is bestseller quality material. Harry Potter at first glance is nothing more than a really good children's book, but it is quite complex when seriously considered. It's not Tolstoy or Dickens, but it's not Dr. Seuss. Schwab reads the books with his daughter, something he aludes to in his post, which no doubt accounts for his opinion:
The "burgeoning sexuality" of the characters is also a total fucking non-issue...This is literature folks, not real life. If you're uncomfortable addressing such pre-teen and teen subjects, LEAVE THEM OUT. These books aren't about coming-of-age, they are about a story, plain and simple.
Oh boy. First off, literature is best when it is a successful imitation of real life. For fantasy and sci-fi, correct and detailed characterizations are essential to maintaining a good story; the environment is so radical that the characters must be what allows readers to connect with a story. I would have real issues with a story about two fifteen year old guys and one girl which contains no mention of "burgeonin sexuality". Would someone write a book about a Muggle high school and entirely ignore the romantic relationships of the characters? I think not.
And the Harry Potter books
are a coming of age story that bears remarkable similarities to our post-9/11 world. Three children who have previously known only peace are thrust into a new environment where they are the targets, where people close to them have been killed, and where the enemy bears an irrational hatred to anyone of a certain ethnicity (Muggles). Sound familiar? I could go on, drawing parallels between Harry and America, but I won't. I gather that you can figure it out on your own.
In the meanwhile, if someone is so starved for Harry Potter material that they feel the need to write nasty letters to JKR, there are a plethora of more enjoyable alternatives. Go read other published sci-fi authors: Terry Pratchett, Neil Gaiman, Orson Scott Card, Diana Wynne Jones, George RR Martin...the list could go on. Or read Harry Potter
fanfiction -- and I can feel Becky glaring at me for daring to mention this -- but there is a huge online community of HP fans who have produced some
very impressive prose.